In 1633, Catholic authorities forced Galileo, under threat of torture, to recant his thesis that the sun does not revolve around the earth. Rand Paul made a similarly forbidden and revolutionary assertion after his primary election victory for the US Senate in Kentucky in May. Paul suggested that Article 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 should not have been passed. (The Act violates the 14th Amendment by giving blacks and all minorities preferential rights and services over the majority, the majority being the white European people that founded America) Paul was immediately pilloried as a potential racist and forced to largely retract, on penalty of political ruin.
Paul was threatening a cornerstone of the liberal PC (politically correct), “anti-bias” establishment. Its Civil Rights Act of 1964 deprived business owners of their right to control their property by forcing them to hire and not fire quotas of minorities less qualified than whites. The Act is the indispensable foundation for “anti-hate” legislation that currently floods Congress and local statehouses; all federal hate and bias crime bills are amendments to it. Such ever-proliferating laws now steal free speech along with our right to control our businesses and property as we see fit.
For at least 500 years, English, and later American, law has said a man’s home is his castle and a business he has labored to create belongs to him alone. Just as a café can post “No shirt, no shoes, no service,” something entrepreneurs took for granted for centuries; their right to refuse to serve or employ anyone, for any reason.
Jesus Taught Sanctity of Property Rights
Jesus taught our duty to share with the needy, even to renounce all loyalty to one’s possessions to most fully follow Him. Yet in His parable of workers in the vineyard (Matthew 21), He said that if those who came at the beginning of the day agree to a fixed wage they can’t complain of injustice if the owner pays the same to one who labored for only one hour. According to Christ, discretionary power belongs entirely to the owner. Today, the owner of the vineyard could be severely fined for “wage discrimination.” Clearly, the ethics of Christ are radically different from the values of “non-discrimination” that now prevail. Jesus’ view of the sanctity of private property largely prevailed in the Western world from at least the time of the Magna Carta—until the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Civil rights dogma reflects a Marxist philosophy that has become to prevalent today. It says capital and the property of landowners, should largely belong to the masses who have done nothing to acquire or maintain it. Communism has one great objective: abolition of private property, both in ownership and control. For Marxists, the power of property must be destroyed; small and large accumulations mean independence and, thus, power to resist tyranny. After every communist revolution of the 20th century, the property owner who resisted divestment was killed. Under the Civil Rights Act, the property owner who does not open his business to the employment of less qualified minorities or women can be indicted for a crime, and possibly a business-destroying federal lawsuit.
Although the Civil Rights Act was propelled into existence by the genuine concern and idealism of tens of millions of sincere Americans, it was no accident that Marxist ideology played an enormous role in its passage. The U.S. Communist party and activist liberals based out of New York that spearheaded communism in Russia financed by the International bankers of the Federal Reserve owned by the “House of Rothschild” also played its role by promoting and inciting racial unrest among blacks and made it a top priority to create social unrest and dissatisfaction to break down the existing order during the 60’s American communist revolution. Their goal is world control by the few over the many. (Homosexuals are being used in a very similar way today as the blacks were used in the 1960’s.)
Liberal dominated media in the early ’60s, as well as today, stimulated national remorse over mistreatment of blacks under slavery and segregation. They urged Americans to grant blacks greater rights and privileges than the majority, (and there is no doubt blacks were the minority and treated differently). Such included affirmative action programs and quotas, guaranteeing blacks entry into high-tier professions such as medicine and law as well as service jobs including police and firefighters. These quotas indulged minorities with qualifications and GPAs (grade point average) well below those demanded of whites. The Act also said no property owner or businessman can refuse to hire (un)qualified minorities, fire them, or decline to rent or sell property to them because of “prejudice.” (Quickly, feminists obtained similar special privileges under the Marxist/Communist newly usurped legal precedent.)
Despite its ostensible altruism, the Civil Rights Act represented an inversion of the law of God and nature previously enshrined in western civilization. Today, a tiny slave master class in government, comprised of the formerly “oppressed”, now divest power from the majority as they implement their Communist/Socialist objective upon America. A new slaveholder is quick at hand to rule over a global plantation and a new whip hand will soon crack over the dispossessed majority if we fail to enlighten our fellow man to the possibility of such an horrific future. George Orwell described this parasitic utopia known as Communism/Socialism very bluntly in his master piece tome 1984: “If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever”
A denial of personal liberties, property rights, as well as the right to defend family, ourselves and country underlies the Communist/Socialist agenda. The Anti-Defamation League and other like minded groups perform as guard dogs for world communism by financing worldwide campaigns against free speech by promoting hate crimes laws, willfully or naively, these organizations are contributing to the loss of universal freedoms and will continue for years to come unfortunately, if not stopped. ADL hate laws, from America to Canada to Australia, are all based on the same premise: disproportionate rights for the so called “victims” [sic] of Christian civilization and the abolition of fundamental rights to everyone else, including the unalienable rights to free speech, property and the right to defend family and country.
Greater Evil than Lunch Counter Discrimination
What would happen if we repealed the faulty Civil Rights Act which, as Rand Paul said, should never have been passed? Would segregation come back? No. Discriminating businesses would go bankrupt, socially and economically penalized by a new society which would not tolerate such bigotry. The public, not the government, should punish discrimination (especially through the power of the dollar).
Let’s look at the big picture and the real threat. If America continues to deny some the freedom to be bigoted in use of their property or the right to free speech or the right to defend family and country, we face a much more bigoted and dangerous consequence: by allowing a politically correct population under the ADL and other intrusive groups that oppose the premise that man is born into this world with unalienable God given rights, the European American will be treated wrongly and discriminated against by the minority in the country their ancestors founded. Our forefathers were willing to die for freedom at the expense of their family, friends and fellow countrymen’s lives in a bloody war for Independence against tyranny to secure a future for their posterity, we are that posterity and we must not desecrate those men and allow their actions to be for not. The essence of those great men must manifest once again in the hearts and souls of the true red white and blue American of today. Discrimination against blacks by a small minority that existed primarily in the South is no longer an issue with the election of an African man to the office of President of the United States of America. The irony of it all is so profound , the issue of race in America. It is well documented that white Americans voted in unison to elect Barack Obama, sealing their own fate, now the white Americans are the victims of discrimination and receive absolutely no protection under the federal hate crimes law conceived by the ADL, passed by Congress, signed into law by President Obama and now enforced by Homeland Security against its own people leading to the loss of freedom in America.
Society only dimly understands the necessity of protecting our rights to control private property and what is outlined in the “Bill of Rights”, “freedom from” government intrusion. Americans don’t understand the danger in giving government even partial control over their lives. Free speech and religion, the autonomy of property ownership and the second amendment to the “Bill of Rights” is society’s strongest barriers against tyranny and our God given rights. If America is ever to be restored and enjoy long-lasting benefit from Tea Party renewal, the premises empowering a never-ending profusion of freedom-destroying bias and hate crimes laws must be dismantled. America must return to the sufficiency of the Constitution and Bill of Rights to guarantee equality to all.
America must again make it illegal—even treasonous—for government to exalt one group above another. If such were reestablished as the law of the land, ADL and other like minded organizations who’s sole existence is the oppression of mans God given rights, as so eloquently spelled out in the Declaration of Independence and restated in the “Bill of Rights”; mans right to be free, could no longer force its warped ideology on the people of the greatest country in the history of man, “the land of the free and the home of the brave” one nation under God, America.
God Bless America and Long Live the Republic!!! Happy Independence Day 2010 and Always.
“The Civil Rights Act of 1964 must be repealed.”